2017 Austin MotoGP Friday Round Up: Honda's Real Weakness, And Much More

It looks like we have been wrong all along. As usual. All this time, we thought it was the engine which was the problem for Honda. This would be a major issue, as engine designs are sealed and fixed for an entire season in MotoGP, at least for factories which have gathered sufficient podium credits to qualify as competitive under the rules. With nine wins last year, and a MotoGP title, Honda definitely does that.

Maybe the problem isn't the engine after all, however. Honda riders are starting to express the apparently unpopular opinion inside HRC that maybe the solution isn't to rejig the engine again by playing around with firing orders, crankshaft counterweights, and other internal moving parts now set in aspic until the season ends at Valencia. Perhaps, they suggest, Honda could take a look at its chassis, and try finding solutions there.

Cal Crutchlow was the most vociferous, though that is an extremely relative term when speaking of rider statements about the Japanese manufacturer they ride for. "I think we need to start working with the chassis a bit more," Crutchlow told us after another hard day at a very physical track. "That's not a comment against my manufacturer, against my team, it's just a comment that we've looked at the engine for the last two years, and I believe that a lot will come from the chassis. Sure, some electronics, but I think it's chassis. I've ridden other bikes, so I know what the chassis is doing. And I believe that's where we could improve a lot. Because the engine is sealed, that's done, it's done and dusted."

More speak out

He wasn't the only one, however. Dani Pedrosa was more circumspect, as you might expect from a rider in the direct employ of HRC. But the Repsol Honda rider's comments were pretty much the same. The chassis was definitely something that needed to be looked at, he said. "It's one of the things, for sure. We are working in many different areas. We want to do the right step forward. Obviously, the engine we can't change or modify, so we need to see which areas we can improve. We are working, and getting the best information to see what's the best move, in the chassis or in the electronics."

The difficulty the Honda riders face in persuading HRC to listen to them is that there were three of them in the top seven at the end of Friday. The Honda RC213V does one thing exceptionally well, which is brake very late and drag the brakes deep into the corner, stopping and turning in better than probably any other rider on the grid. At a track like the Circuit of The Americas in Austin, with four or five spots where hard braking is decisive, that can turn into a big advantage.

That advantage comes at a cost, however. "There's no explanation for it," Crutchlow answered when he was asked why there were so many Hondas at or near the top of the timesheets. "I think we're still by far the hardest bike to ride on the grid. As I've said in many interviews lately, I think Honda have the most versatile riders and the ones who are riding the hardest." Crutchlow was at pains to add that he did not mean that the riders on other bikes were less talented, or not trying as hard, but merely that the Honda was forcing its riders to dig very deep if they wanted to be competitive.

Losing compromise

The strain of relying on the RC213V's front end also places a burden on the front tire. The Honda riders invariably complain about the Michelin front, that it doesn't offer enough support and tends to overheat quickly. Asked if he would have liked to have the stiffer construction front Michelin in Austin, Crutchlow was phlegmatic. "It is what it is. I don't think it's a Michelin problem. I've been saying for a long time, these tires seems to work a lot with the other bikes, but not with ours. So I don't think it's a Michelin problem. They're working hard, they're doing a good job I feel. But I believe we will be a lot faster with something we could work with, or not have as much risk."

There is some merit to the argument that the problem is not with the engine. Firstly, as Crutchlow points out, Honda have made two significant changes to their engine in the past two years. First, they reversed the direction of the crankshaft so it spins backwards instead of forwards, and added mass to the crankshaft to make the engine respond less aggressively to the throttle. This year, they modified the firing interval, turning a classic screamer into a big bang engine, and taking two different approaches to do so.

Untouched frame

Meanwhile, the chassis has remained largely unchanged. The frame has received only minor updates, and various peripheral parts have been tweaked. Marc Márquez is racing with basically the same frame he used in 2014, after abandoning an update halfway through his torrid 2015 season. The other Honda riders have slightly more modern frames, but even those have not seen any major revisions for at least a season.

This seems odd. When you change an engine as radically as turning it from a screamer into a big bang, you radically alter its character. Understandably, an engine with a different character needs a different chassis to get the most out of it. It's all very well changing the way the engine behaves, but a motorcycle is a holistic entity. It is like a sliding puzzle: move a single piece, and you achieve nothing. The puzzle pieces all have to be shifted through a specific sequence before it even starts to make sense.

So changing the engine character should have been accompanied by a thorough review of the chassis dynamics. How does the new engine affect the swing arm? How do the forces applied to the frame change? Are the swing arm pivot and the headstock still in the ideal place? Does the bike need new suspension linkages, new triple clamps? How does it affect the suspension?

Has HRC conducted such a review? It seems vanishingly unlikely they should have neglected such a step. And yet there is precious little evidence of radical new thinking in terms of the chassis. Or perhaps there is, but it is indistinguishable visibly from the old thinking.

The goose which lays the golden eggs

There is one very powerful reason why Honda may have neglected such a review. That reason is the man who has won three world championships in the past four seasons. Márquez has come to rely almost entirely on his ability to make up ground on corner entry, braking late and trailing the brakes all the way to the apex. The reigning world champion has the rear stepped out not just in a straight line, but also when the bike is leaned way over, almost on its ear.

That places yet more load on the front tire, pushing the limits of tire durability and grip. Márquez is forced to surf a wave of risk all the way into the corner, because of a lack of rear grip and acceleration. Márquez acknowledged on Friday that the chassis needs study, but he also voiced a fear of the costs changing the chassis may bring with it. "It’s true that in the chassis area still we need to work," Márquez said. "But in the corners still we are really fast. We have problems with the front confidence and we have problems with the front tire but we are the fastest ones in the entry of the corner."

We've been here before

It is rather reminiscent of an anecdote related to me by Dennis Noyes. When Kevin Schwantz was at Suzuki between 1988 and 1995, he was always far more competitive than his teammate. The problem, it turned out, was that Schwantz only wanted the bike to do one thing: brake better, later, and deeper than any other bike. Other areas got neglected, the bike not accelerating like it should and being underpowered. But Schwantz didn't care: as long as he could outbrake his rivals, he could manage the rest.

That seems to be where the Honda RC213V is at at the moment. The bike is excellent on the brakes and superb at corner entry. Perhaps a little too good: the rest of the bike's performance has been sacrificed to serve this one area. Improvement is possible, but like all of vehicle dynamics, it requires compromise. If the Honda is to get more drive out of corners, and be more stable over bumps and in a straight line, engineers will have to give up some its quicksilver handling and mercurial corner entry.

The actual engineering involved is not easy, but it's not exactly rocket science either. It is a small matter of engineering, of poring over models, running countless finite element analysis chassis simulations, then having test riders grind out the miles on the bike. It won't be done in a week, or even a month, but there is no reason for it to take two or three more years.

Who moved his Manchego?

The hard part is getting Marc Márquez to accept the changes, of course. The thing is, Márquez is still winning on the bike. He is, after all, the reigning world champion, and came into the 2017 season as favorite for the title. He knows he can win with what he has, so why give up on that if the changes being made offer only uncertain benefits? Though Márquez has much to gain, he also has an awful lot to lose if things go wrong.

This, after all, is why HRC value Cal Crutchlow so highly. Not because he is on the brink of becoming a MotoGP Alien, but because he is an "ordinary" rider of exceptional talent, a rider of more or less average height and average weight, capable of scoring outstanding results when things work out right. He is not a freakish talent who can ride around almost any problem imaginable and balance one-fingered on a razor's edge without falling off too often. Nor is he a freakish talent of diminutive stature and weighing less than the handgrips on the bike. Crutchlow is human, and HRC need to start building bikes for humans again.

Yet change may be in the air at HRC. Márquez was reportedly furious after FP1, after having followed Johann Zarco around. Asked if he was surprised at how fast Maverick Viñales had been on the Movistar Yamaha, Márquez was curt. "No. I followed Zarco, and I understood everything. They have more or less the same bike. They have really strong points, and we have to try hard to attack on other points. Because there, on those points we are really far behind."

Despite that, Márquez ended the first day of practice in Austin as fastest. His best time came with a caveat, however. Márquez set his time on a new soft rear tire. Maverick Viñales, third quickest and four tenths slower than Márquez, put his best time in on a medium rear tire which had already seen its fair share of laps. Márquez may have been quicker than Viñales, but it is fair to say that Viñales was not even trying.

Absorbing the bumps

All this talk of three Hondas in the top seven overlooks the fact that all four Yamahas were in the top eight. Yamahas filled slots two, three, and four at the end of FP2, with Johann Zarco just beating out Maverick Viñales and Valentino Rossi. Jonas Folger brought up the rear in eighth, just under a second behind Márquez and a quarter of a second behind Valentino Rossi.

Why were the Yamahas so strong? "Yamaha over the bumps is really good, really stable," Márquez explained. "And on acceleration, it looks like they improve every year more and more."

The bumps were a big bone of contention on Friday at COTA. "The track is a lot worse compared to last year, a lot of bumps, and this I don’t expect," Valentino Rossi said, voicing a sentiment commonly heard. "It will be a problem for the future because already the track is difficult and on the bumps more difficult." The bumps were probably caused by the F1 car race at the track, rather than anything else. The bumps were tightly spaced, rather than being big deep holes like they had been in Argentina.

The bumps were a topic the riders intended to bring up in the Safety Commission. With the circuit's contract up for renewal, Dorna is likely to push for the track to be resurfaced as a condition. However, as the track is badly strapped for cash, finding the money to do that may be rather difficult. Dorna regard a race in the US as vital for the future of the sport in America. Yet finding a track which is financially viable to host it remains a very difficult matter.

Any other business

There were other items worthy of note on Friday. Firstly, Valentino Rossi appears to have come to grips with the front end issues which had plagued his season so far. The radical change to weight distribution tried in Argentina was still working, making him hopeful of being competitive from the start.

There was also another aerodynamic novelty on display in Austin. KTM rolled out its new aerodynamic fairing, a nose with winglets that didn't look as if they would be legal. But I checked with Danny Aldridge, and he explained that KTM were operating very narrowly within the letter of the regulations. The winglets were swept back toward the rear of the bike, and not the front. They did no protrude beyond the width of the handlebars. And the shape is such that the winglet part is quite thick, and returns back in a curve to the fairing, making them far more integrated as part of the fairing, rather than stuck on to the fairing like the winglets were last year.

The response from the riders was positive. "Here the back straight is turning, up and down and bumpy. The bike was shaking quite a lot. But with this fairing it felt more stable and we can put a little bit more power," Pol Espargaro confirmed. Bradley Smith agreed. "For me it was a step in the right direction. It was designed for less wheelie and we definitely wheelied less and that's a positive because we don't lose as much in the acceleration."

After being written off by all and sundry after the first two races, Jorge Lorenzo felt more comfortable and more confident on Friday in Austin. The change to the seating position had helped, sliding him forward and putting more weight on the front of the bike. "The position is still not good, but the feeling is much better," Lorenzo said. "The position on the bike, the way I enter the corners is better, even if here the bumps get bigger compared to last year, and the absorption of the bumps is not perfect, we still need to work on that, because the bike over the bumps becomes very unstable, and we struggle a little bit there. But in general, a better feeling, I can do more laps in a good pace, and we are not so far from third, fourth, or fifth position."

Austin is a very tough track for Ducati. The bike is quick enough, but it is even more physically demanding than anywhere else. Andrea Dovizioso was rather downbeat when he spoke to reporters. The bumps are causing the riders to suffer, and struggle to cope with the bike. Though he could push for a single fast lap, actually maintaining that pace could well prove to be exceptionally tricky.

Gathering the background information for long articles such as these is an expensive and time-consuming operation. If you enjoyed this article, please consider supporting MotoMatters.com. You can help by either taking out a subscription, buying the beautiful MotoMatters.com 2017 racing calendar, by making a donation, or by contributing via our GoFundMe page.

Back to top


Been hanging all day waiting for this. Honda and Marc starting to sound very much like Ducati and a certain Australian rider of some years ago, "your winning races so the bike must be good" Interesting to see just what happens with that. Thanks again


a few years ago if you talked negative about the honda  you would be fired ore ditched ..  at the end of the season . people where afraid of the honda HRC department . 

just look at stoner how they treated him when he was a test rider after his retirement. And the there was Cal cruthy ;)  he was was finaly dare te speak against the honda HRC and thank god ohters rider did it too. like redding,  then pedrosa, miller and the rest follewed  honda was starting to feel some back lash  even more when marc  joined  the group 

when  4 riders speaking about this you have to start thinking as racing factory the will have to change .




Fairly certain Dani threatened to leave HRC back in 2008 (found a dead google link, it was at the end of 2007) or so if they didn't pull their finger out with various things.  Pretty sure it was over engine power and lack of Bridgestone tyres.

So no, Cal wasn't the first.  Dani has complained before, I do suspect however that he's more diplomatic about it and airs his grievances via internal channels rather than spouting off to reporters.

Interesting analysis as ever David. It seems as usual the bikes are crap and the riders superb !

The fact that the riders are struggling on the bumps at COTA gives cause for concern in that if one accepts that the problem is the F1 cars, who obviously race just once a year, if the circuit is not repaved this year, after the F1 circus has come and gone the track may resemble something more suited to mtocross.

This years F1 cars now have more power and crucially, wider tyres and more downforce. Therefore, it would be logical to assume that this years cars will wreak even more havoc on what seems to be a marginal surface at the moment. They are braking later and cornering faster, both factors that will give the track surface a very hard time. Perhaps, in the interests of safety, after the F1 race, Dorna could arrange for someone who has ridden MotoGP to take a bike round to ascertain what, if any, further damage has been caused to the track.


his name is Loris Capirossi.

As for COTA, they may be pennywise and pound foolish (I have not seen the mix design or ridden a track day there).  The stability of hot-mix asphalt is highly dependent on the fraction of crushed particles in the mix, the gradation of the aggregate, and the quality of the binder.  Increasing crushed particles and using a highly polymer modified asphaltic cement binder will provide both increased grip (particularly in the wet) and higher resistance to rutting and shoving in hot weather, but it comes at a significant extra up-front cost.  But most track owners go with a less expensive mix intended for residential streets, with the resulting problems.

Other problem at COTA is the hot and humid climate resulting in chemical weathering of the soils, which produces high surface area clay minerals that expand and contract significantly with changes in moisture content, creating bumps in the track.  The only way to address this is subgrade replacement with granular or chemically modified/bound materials and improved sub-surface drainage, all of which also significantly increases up-front construction costs.

Think I got the gist of that. My question: if the problem is largely concentrated in certain areas, why can't the track simply be patched? I realize that's a stopgap, but the road crews around here are able to do it and keep things pretty smooth. Couldn't an elite racetrack paving squad could do a pretty clean job? How could it be worse than the present situation? 

is that asphalt cement ages due to oxidation, evaporation of the lighter petroluem fractions, and UV exposure, as well as some densification occuring from traffic.  All of which leads to inconsistent traction between the newer patches and older pavement, particularly when wet, and makes everyone not named Pawi nervous.

After watching both practices yesterday with the sound turned down it is amazing to see what all these riders are going thru with the bumps on track.  Towards the end of FP2 I saw Marquez save the bike on his elbow!  Between the bumps and the front end of the Honda it's going to be a long race for these guys.  But I never count Marquez out any more than I do Rossi on raceday.

This is a true car racetrack with the long straights and stop and go corners.  I don't see MotoGP coming here for many years to come just like all the other tracks in this country they've been to.  I'm sure there is a more suitable track somewhere is the USA.

What mm said last year was : the Honda isnt a bad bike That everybuddy says. This year because of the bigbang he has more traction and he his bike is the best on breaking and mm said hes fast through the corners and fastest on corner entry. Yet Again the Honda is a bad bike.
The Yamaha is fast through the corners but not the fastest because That was Suzuki, Yamaha has good traction but not the best because Ducati is best. Yamaha is good on the breaks but not the best because the Honda is. So maybe we should talk about how bad the Yamaha is because it doesnt exel in any part. Ok like mm mv also says the bike is good but we need to improve. And That sound familiar doesnt it. SN said Yamaha is a good bike overal but doesnt exel in anything like the traction or topspeed like Ducati and not the breaking of Honda nor the quickest through the corners. Seems Yamaha is a bad bike to me.

As much as folks try and portray this as rocket science it really isn't. The RCV didn't all of a sudden hook reverse gear while YamaZukAti were hooking 4th gear. Instead the RCV has seen incremental improvements in engine characteristics with no discernible improvement in acceleration? Yet top speed was always pretty good,  so no lack of hp.

I dunno, but to see all the recent engine changes with no improvement has always seemed to point to the problem being something they AREN'T changing (frame/swingarm/geometry) rather than something they are.

I really struggle to see the RCV lambasted as it is, with 4 different winning riders on RCV's last season, in rain and shine, not mention Marquez wrapping up the title with 3 races to spare. 




That would explain explain everything. More wheelies and abrupt weight transfer, more ease to load up the front tire (again from the abrupt weight transfer), quicker steering and overall higher agility.

As I said before I think the solution is a bit obvious, but it saddens me that said solution makes for even more homogeneity on the grid. I still personally hope Honda goes left and starts playing with a multilink rear end to retain or even shorten the already short wheelbase while mitigating the rear grip and wheelie issues. Technical innovation in the grid, outside of Suzuki's VVT system, is pretty much nonexistent; and the ground work and experience for a new rear end design is already in Honda's quiver. Their front end is glorious so while I'd love to see them ditch the ancient telescoping fork I'd be a fool to suggest they fix the only thing working for them. But a clean slate outside-the-box approach to the rear end could be just what the RCV (and geeks like me) need.

... was tried in Moto2 by Taylormade (IIRC).

Even if it is technically better, part of the problem is that you have kids who have been riding telescopic forks since they were 3-4 years old, and they are attuned to the way they feel.

Pushing at 110% on unfamiliar feeling equipment is likely not going to happen, and you can't just replace 15-30 years worth of experience.

Also, pretty sure Honda did do their revolutionary rear suspension back at the start of the MotoGP class - unit pro-link.  It uses a progressive linkage to remain supple yet capable of handling large loads already.

I suspect part of the reason the bike is so front end biased and heavy braking biased is two-fold:

  • its the most common place to make a pass - out-brake the opponent and block-pass
  • given the myriad of electronics on the rear wheel (traction control, engine braking control, etc.) the front end, under brakes is where the rider can really make a difference.  electronic interference on that end of the bike is still limited.

The fact that HRC have also in the past taken pride in being at the top of the power stakes (or there-abouts) also means they're well suited to building a bike that brakes deep and late then squares off the corner to power out.

Trouble is, Yamaha have caught up in the engine power department and seem to be easier on tyres due to carrying corner speed better.  Without the horsepower advantage (or at least ability to put said power down) the brake late and deep technique of the honda is all well and good for passing, but likely makes it harder to keep up to be able to pass in the first place.



Unit Pro-link info for those interested.  It debuted on the RC211V.  Still in use on current honda sports bikes today.