2022 Sepang MotoGP Test Review, Part 2: Ducati's Box Of Tricks

In part one of the Sepang MotoGP test review, I went over some of the more general aspects of the test. The fact that it was difficult to draw hard conclusions from a test which was both short and disrupted by rain. The fact that most manufacturers had brought updated engines, which means there is still a lot of work ahead to calibrate them and extract maximum performance from them. The fact that testing cleans the track and lays a nice thick skin of rubber on the track, creating much more grip than on a race weekend.

That doesn't mean that the test is meaningless. If it was, the manufacturers wouldn't bother, of course. But to understand the state of MotoGP after the Sepang test, we have to take a close look at what each factory was testing in Malaysia, what the riders said worked, what they said didn't work, and what the factories weren't telling us about.

So in the next few articles, I will breakdown everything we learned and what we saw at the Sepang test from each factory. But we start with the factory which ended the test fastest, and which received the most attention.

Ducati – pushing the envelope, again

Before the Sepang MotoGP test, we were all wondering who would bring some surprising new technology that would push the limits of performance again. It should therefore be no surprise that Ducati has once again found something that nobody else had either considered, thought feasible, or believed was not worth investigating.

As I wrote on Saturday night, after a tip from Tom Morsellino, what Ducati have found is a way to apply a ride-height device to the front of the Desmosedici. Hidden behind the aerodynamic fork covers sits a hydraulic cylinder, connected to the bottom of the fork leg. That is used to keep the front of the bike low on corner exit, working together with rear ride-height device to lower the center of mass, improve drive, and boost acceleration.

Ducati implicitly confirmed that I was on to something on Saturday night by what I saw on Sunday morning. Walking down pit lane, I saw that the Pramac mechanics had taped over the gap between the two halves of the fork leg covers, hiding the cylinder from view. That it was done to hide what lay behind it rather than to improve aerodynamics was obvious from the fact that it was only on the right-hand fork cover.

After writing about the front holeshot device, however, I began to have doubts. Conversations with ex-Moto2 crew chief Peter Bom and 500GP winner Simon Crafar, I began to have doubts. Crafar felt that lowering the front in the corner would be counterproductive. Front end feel is pretty much everything to riders, he explained, so confusing riders by having the front drop away from them in a corner would be a bad idea.

Talking to Crafar and Bom, I pondered an alternative explanation, that the cylinder at the front is being used as a way of triggering the rear ride-height device and lowering the rear of the bike. That would be adding a lot of complexity for a very marginal gain, however.

This morning, Malaysian photographer Hazrin Yeob Men Shah provided definitive proof. He sent me a series of photographs taken at the exit of Turn 14 which showed the Ducati with both ride-height devices engaged, and without them. That shows very clearly how much the bike has been lowered, both at the rear with the shock lowered, and at the front, with the forks still compressed. To illustrate, I created an animated gif of the two.

If you look at the front fork, you can see that even though the front wheel is in the air in both shots, the fork is compressed by at least 2 to 3 centimeters when the ride-height device is engaged. That means there is something keeping the front of the bike lower, more than just due to the weight of the rider. That is a very strong indication that the front ride-height device exists, and operates on the front forks.

To read the remaining 1061 words of this article, you need to sign up to become a MotoMatters.com site supporter by taking out a subscription. You can find out more about subscribing to MotoMatters.com here. If you are already a subscriber, log in to read the full text.

This is part of a regular series of unique insights into the world of motorcycle racing, exclusive for MotoMatters.com site supporters. The series includes interviews, background information, in-depth analysis, and opinion, and is available to everyone supporting the site by taking out a subscription.

If you would like to read more of our exclusive content you can join the growing band of site supporters, by taking out a subscription here. If you prefer, you can also support us on our Patreon page and get access to the same exclusive material there.


Back to top


I suggested something similar in the previous story on the alleged device. Would give a huge amount of adjustability to the system too and still all mechanically actioned. However, as sure as the Sun comes up, I'm wrong.

The biggest thing about the bikes in the paddock is Ducati.  Gigi keeps working and working to get the thing to turn which has been its problem for years.  The post 2021 season test was mind boggling as they were even faster.  Now they have more HP/TQ, new gizmos to help with corner exit and the thing just keeps turning better and better.  I’m all for it too.  I still detest the wings, winglets, whatever you want to call them and aero because in your local twisties or a track day it means absolutely nothing.  But anything to rub HRC’s nose in it I’m always going to be onboard.  It’s a beautiful thing to see a smaller factory beat them and/or one who spends less.  Perhaps with the VAG money, Ducati is spending similar money, who knows?  But I wish Ducati and KTM all the success.  They embarrassed the field so bad in 2007 that Japanese factories had to change their spring valves for pneumatic valves.  It seems 15 years later we may get a repeat or 2.0 of that embarrassment.  I hope so.  Yamaha, anyone, anyone, Yamaha? ;)

Thanks David for this wonderful insight. That's why I'm a subscriber, to get this kind of information that only your kind of trained eye can spot.

And, on a side note, I am proud of you because the GIF you made! Excelling as a Millennial user of social media and websites! :)

My new something or other brand camera/googling device apparently allows me to also talk to people not nearby. I’m not sure how to do that though, seems complicated.

Careful with that thing!

"Naked midget pocketbike racing" search like that may get you in trouble.

A slippery slope (oh! Add oiled/greased?)

No, I’m safe as houses; to hide my obsessions with bikes, old ships and old bands I tell everyone I’m looking at mucky stuff, at which, given my age, even the wife just nods and smiles.