Skip to main content
2010 Moto2 Championship Standings After Round 1, Losail, Qatar
| 1 |
Shoya TOMIZAWA |
JPN |
25 |
|
| 2 |
Alex DEBON |
SPA |
20 |
-5 |
| 3 |
Jules CLUZEL |
FRA |
16 |
-9 |
| 4 |
Toni ELIAS |
SPA |
13 |
-12 |
| 5 |
Roberto ROLFO |
ITA |
11 |
-14 |
| 6 |
Mattia PASINI |
ITA |
10 |
-15 |
| 7 |
Thomas LUTHI |
SWI |
9 |
-16 |
| 8 |
Simone CORSI |
ITA |
8 |
-17 |
| 9 |
Gabor TALMACSI |
HUN |
7 |
-18 |
| 10 |
Sergio GADEA |
SPA |
6 |
-19 |
| 11 |
Dominiqu AEGERTER |
SWI |
5 |
-20 |
| 12 |
Alex BALDOLINI |
ITA |
4 |
-21 |
| 13 |
Fonsi NIETO |
SPA |
3 |
-22 |
| 14 |
Karel ABRAHAM |
CZE |
2 |
-23 |
| 15 |
Lukas PESEK |
CZE |
1 |
-24 |
Comments
Any recourse for spec part failure?
Wondering if there is any recourse for a team in the event that it is forced into retirement during a race due to a failure with a spec part of the bike. E.g., assuming (for the sake of discussion -- I don't know this to be the fact) that Julian Simon's retirement in Qatar were due to a failure with the spec Suter clutch, would the team have any recourse against Suter, Geo, Dorna, etc.? If a team were forced to retire due to an engine failure, would it have any recourse? (And I'm not talking about a new engine for the upcoming race; I mean any financial compensation for the already blown race.)